|
|
TWO PARALLEL WORKSHOPS (March 13, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 –
8.45 AM 8.45 – 9.30 AM
|
Plenary
session 1- Minimal Residual Disease Plenary session 2- Minimal Residual Disease (Alternative perspective)
|
Dario
Compana Mike Borowitz
|
|
|
Plenary session 3 – Introduction to FCM data analysis in Hematolymphoid Malignancies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simultaneous
Workshops
Workshop
1 - Minimal residual disease Workshop 2 - FCM data analysis in Hematolymphoid
Malignancies
|
Dario,
Elaine Coustan-Smith
Brent, Mike Borowitz
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TWO DAYS MEETING ON GUIDELINES
(March 14-15, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indications for FCM in hematological
malignancies
|
Mike
|
|
|
Suggested panel for acute leukemia
– Indian Perspective
|
|
|
|
Critique - Panel selection for
acute leukemia - European perspective
|
|
|
|
Critique - Panel selection for
acute leukemia - American Perspective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panel discussion on guidelines for panel selection in acute leukemias – MB Agarwal
|
Dario, Brent, Rajive, Banavali
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested panel for mature lymphoma
– Indian Perspective
|
|
|
|
Critique - Panel selection for
mature B/T cell lymphomas - European perspective
|
|
|
|
Critique – Panel selection
for mature B/T cell neoplasm - American Perspective
|
|
|
|
Panel discussions on
guidelines of panel selection in mature lymphomas - S Gupta
|
Estella, Mike, Maria, Borges
|
|
|
Circulating endothelial cells and Endothelial
progenitor cells: Emerging Biomarkers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consensus for Immunophenotyping panel in
lymphoma
|
|
|
|
Consensus for Immunophenotyping panel in acute leukemia
|
|
|
|
Evolution of hematopoietic stem cell assays
|
|
|
|
QC issues in stem cell assays
|
|
|
|
EQAS in immunophenotyping
|
|
|
|
Panel discussion on stem cell counts – The Indian Scenario– N Khattry
|
Mary, Velu, Badri, Ashish
|
|
11.00 – 11.15AM
|
|
|
|
|
Training
of Cytometrists – Indian perspective
|
|
|
|
Training
of Cytometrists – European perspective
|
|
|
12.00 - 12.30PM
|
Training of Cytometrists – US
perspective
|
|
|
|
Panel discussion on training
cytometrists in India – Awtar Krishan
|
Mike, Dario, Maria, Krishnamurthy,
Ghosh, Neelam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QC issues - sample collection, preservation, storage and transportation
|
|
|
|
QC issues - sample processing, and instrument setup
|
|
|
|
QC issues – Acquisition,
analysis, interpretation and reporting
|
|
|
|
Panel discussion on quality
control issues – Mary
|
Elaine, Estella, Brent, Swati,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|